A Stoning in Iraq
Warning: This topic will make you a little squeamish...so if you're looking for something lighthearted to read today, please skip this message.
A recent LA Times article discusses yet another tragic death in Iraq. A 17 year-old girl was killed, aided and abetted by her own family members. Her crime? Loving someone from another religious group. Death by stoning. How biblical. I'm sure US religious conservatives are wishing they could solve their problems with similar efficiency.
We are wasting US lives and wasting US dollars trying to fix the impossible in Iraq. Our vain attempts to spread "freedom and democracy" will never penetrate the darkness of these tribal, fundamentalist minds. I spent 8 months in Baghdad from Jul 04 to Mar 05, so I have some first hand experience. The US military on the ground is doing their absolute best to accomplish their mission, but the problem is, how do you define the mission? There are many unresolved issues here.
The US public was lied to about the reasons for entering Iraq in the first place. Prior to the invasion, the Defense Department would not listen to State Department warnings about how difficult winning the peace would be. Now we're told the military can't withdraw because we will "lose" the war. What is the definition of losing? Better yet...someone define victory for me. A day without car bombs? You're in for a long wait brother!
We have already eliminated (in a way) the WMD, it was a figment of our imagination. We got rid of Saddam. The Iraqis held free elections. Now it's time to pick a day for a withdrawal. Let's say six months from today, 23 Nov 2007. We pull down to about 20,000 troops at a couple bases to provide air and artillery support to the Iraqi government. At that point, US troops will no longer patrol the streets. Implement a 3-5 year plan for the Iraqis to become totally self-reliant for internal security, with no US air/artillery support. The US can remain on-call (off-shore) to help guarantee Iraq's external security, (against potentially Syria or Iran) but let's be honest, they understand the region and have enough internal problems of their own. Do you think they're dumb enough to attempt to send occupying forces into Iraq?
Let's leave Iraq to the Iraqis, and quit trying to fool ourselves that we can do something to really help them fix their problems. I can guarantee you that out of over 130,000 US troops in country, there are less than 100 that truly understand what's going on over there, that have the necessary language and cultural skills to truly identify the "good guys" from the "bad guys". In many cases I believe the security training we provide to the "good guys" by day is then used by those same personnel to settle scores during their off-duty time and eliminate personnel from other ethnic and religious groups. Are we actually helping, or making things worse?
Returning to the LA Times article...members of the religious/ethnic group that plotted the murder of a 17 year old girl would normally be counted as some of our staunchest "friends", non-Sunni Kurds from Northern Iraq. Unintentionally, these are the folks your tax dollars are supporting in Iraq. There are plenty of these atrocities to go around...I'm not focusing blame on any particular group. We are throwing precious lives and money at a problem we do not and will never truly understand....let's stop now. I'm not sure things can get any worse, but we certainly aren't helping, at least with any proportionality to the costs involved.
Let's bring our kids home, let the military regroup and recover from this administration's imperial overreach, and focus instead on protecting our true strategic interests abroad.
The US military is the world's most perfect hammer. We can take on any other military in the world and dispatch them quickly, with ruthless efficiency. I guarantee you that political and military leaders from every other nation understand that fact. The problem is, a hammer isn't really effective when the tool you really need is a screwdriver. Here's an idea, let's use some of the other tools at our disposal to influence world events, instead of trying to use brute force to solve all the problems out there.
PS. If you'd like some interesting reading into the history of US involvement in the Middle East, I recommend the book: Power, Faith and Fantasy by Michael B. Oren. He traces three themes over our repeated involvement in the region. I'm about halfway through it right now. Give it a try and I guarantee you'll learn something interesting you didn't already know about US history.

